Test SearchesOver twenty (20) search engine sites that purport to be global and to index the entire World Wide Web (WWW) were subjected to a general pass/fail test on a standard search for the phrase MANSOOR AMARNA as a bound phrase, coordinated with Boolean AND logic, or coordinated with text proximity operators, where applicable. Only ten (10) of the original test group found the WWW site for the The Mansoor Amarna Collection of Ancient Egyptian art. In a second test on the phrase CHATEAU CHAMBORD only eight (8) of the remaining search engines performed well: Alta Vista, Excite!, Infoseek, Inktomi, Lycos, Open Text Index, WebCrawler and Yahoo! For this reason extensive testing of search engines on ten (10) standard queries was limited to these top eight (8) sites. Ten (10) standard test searches were devised in diverse subject areas and genres in order to gauge the overall performance of the eight (8) selected search engines. In general, single term search queries were presented to the search engines using their own search forms interfaces with default settings, except that the Lycos engine was configured for "fair match." Multiple term queries were presented to search engines which do not offer proximity operators in one of several ways:
Additionally, one or more significant terms was used for sorting in the Alta Vista search engine to group the most relevant items toward the top of the output. The actual test queries and the rationale behind them is presented below:
The search engines were rated on these search queries in four ways:
Relative rankings were cumulated over all search queries and relative rankings were computed as a percent of the highest ranking (AltaVista = 62). The number of times each of the eight (8) search engines was ranked in the top three (3) was also tabulated in the overall rankings. Each search engine was given a subjective overall ranking on a five (5) star scale. Not significant in the overall rankings were the speed of returned search results. All of the tested search engines generally returned results within less than ten (10), and usually within five (5), seconds even at times of peak Internet usage. Significant in the overall rankings were the total number of hits returned. Search engines which either do not return total hits counts, or which make discovery of total hits difficult were ranked lower, all other things being equal. Search engines which returned enormous hit counts, all other things being equal, were rated lower as responding poorly for the average user. Search engines were ranked as having failed if no hits were returned at all, if no relevant hits were returned, or if no relevant hits were returned within the first twenty-five (25) sites listed. |